alt_bill: (Distracted)
Bill Weasley ([personal profile] alt_bill) wrote in [personal profile] alt_rachel 2013-11-20 03:29 am (UTC)

No, this was done, I swear, for the good of the Protectorate. For the good of the animals.

Here's a hint: go back and look at when that line item started showing up in camp budgets. I believe it was about five years back.

Then go back to the previous year before that and check the Muggle maternal death rate. Due to complications related to, er, dropping calves.

Compare it to the maternal death rate this year.

See the difference? It's entirely due thanks to the excellence and reliability of those 'animal husbandry services.' But those services wouldn't have made it into the budget at all if they had been called what they really were.

I daresay that for that very reason, Corax Mulciber will cut them immediately if you say something about it.

I sincerely hope that you don't.

Post a comment in response:

You may post here only if alt_rachel has given you access; posting by non-Access List accounts has been disabled.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting